Rohini d/o Balasubramaniam v Yeow Khim Whye Kelvin and another [2017] SGHC 149


We acted for a property agency, successfully defending this SGD 830,000 lawsuit. The plaintiff argued that the property agency should be made legally responsible for the fraud of a rogue agent, who had misappropriated the plaintiff’s bank account monies. The High Court judge dismissed the plaintiff’s claim largely on the basis that it was the plaintiff’s own severe carelessness in giving the agent blank cheques, which had caused her loss. The plaintiff has appealed the judge’s decision to the Court of Appeal.


make an appointment