Criminal Procedure Code – Standing down Charges

Case note on Criminal Procedure Code – Standing down Charges:
Lim Chit Foo v Public Prosecutor [2019] SGCA 70*

1. In Lim Chit Foo v Public Prosecutor [2019] SGCA 70, the accused person faced several charges for allegedly defrauding the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). He claimed trial to all of them. The prosecution elected to proceed to trial on only some of the charges, and to stand down the rest. This meant that the stood down charges could later be revived, subjecting the accused to a further trial (or multiple further trials) even if he was acquitted after the first trial.

2. The accused person challenged the legality of the prosecution’s approach.

3. The prosecution contended that its right to do so was founded in Section 6 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), allowing it to adopt “such procedure as the justice of the case may require, and which is not inconsistent with the [CPC] or such other law.”

4. The Court of Appeal rejected this. It held instead that the statutory basis for standing down charges is Section 238 of the CPC. This is because once charges have been brought before the court, criminal proceedings are afoot in respect of those charges. The conduct of such proceedings must necessarily fall within the purview of the court. To allow otherwise would be to give the prosecution unfettered control over such proceedings, and in some cases it is conceivable that the prosecution could seek to control the pace and sequence of trials by standing down charges in a manner that might objectively be oppressive to the accused person.

5. Thus, the Court of Appeal posited that the Defence could raise an objection to the prosecution’s application to stand down certain charges pending the trial of others, considering factors such as (1) whether the earlier trial is likely to be completed within a reasonable period of time (2) whether the accused person is in remand or on bail (3) whether the parties have sufficient resources for the trials to be conducted concurrently.

 

*by Chooi Jing Yen

oangledes213

Recent Posts

Road Traffic Act: Updated Framework for Repeat Drink Driving Offences

Introduction In December 2023, a significant judgment was handed down in the case of Lee…

8 months ago

Eugene Thuraisingam LLP X Founders Doc: What is defamation from the case of Rachel Wong v Olivia Wu?

In a video collaboration between Eugene Thuraisingam LLP and Founders Doc, our Suang Wijaya and…

9 months ago

Eugene Thuraisingam as a Guest on the LegalCentred podcast

In February, our partner, Eugene Thuraisingam was invited as a guest on the flagship podcast…

9 months ago

Eugene Thuraisingam LLP Contributes to Singapore Chapter of Lexology Panoramic’s Anti-Bribery & Corruption Guide 2024

We are pleased to announce that Eugene Thuraisingam, Johannes Hadi and Ng Yuan Siang have…

9 months ago

Sentencing Mentally Disordered Offenders: Comparing the River Valley High and Upper Bukit Timah Killings

Introduction Under Section 304(a) of the Penal Code, which punishes a person who commits culpable…

10 months ago

The International Arbitration Review: Singapore

This article by our Hamza Malik originally appeared on the International Arbitration Review. Introduction Singapore…

1 year ago