Principles on Financial Relief after Foreign Divorce

UFN v UFM [2019] SGCA 54

 

1. Introduction

Nakoorsha AK of Nakoorsha Law Corporation, and Suang Wijaya and Johannes Hadi of Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, act for a divorcee, the Wife, in making an application under Chapter 4A of the Women’s Charter. That application was for permission to commence proceedings in Singapore for division of matrimonial property, consequential upon a divorce obtained in the Indonesia courts.

Suang Wijaya is privileged to have been given the opportunity to orally argue this case, before the Family Division of the High Court, and the Court of Appeal. The procedural history of this case (which remains afoot) is set out below.

 

2. Background

In 2017, a Judge of the Family Division of the High Court granted our application. Her judgment is reported as UFM v UFN [2017] SGHCF 22.

In 2018, the opposing party, the Husband, was granted permission to appeal the Judge’s judgment to the Court of Appeal. Permission to appeal was given on the basis that the case involved questions of law of public interest relating to the interpretation of Chapter 4A of the Women’s Charter.

On 9 July 2019, the Husband’s appeal came up for hearing before the Court of Appeal. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court agreed with us that the Judge’s decision was correct, and accordingly dismissed the appeal.

 

3. Grounds of Decision

On 9 October 2019, the Court released its detailed Grounds of Decision. The Court agreed with us on, among other things, the following points of general principle:-

(a) a Chapter 4A applicant does not need to show that Singapore is the more appropriate forum to grant the financial relief sought (as compared to the forum in which the divorce was granted); and

(b) a Chapter 4A applicant does not need to exhaust remedies available in the foreign forum before applying for financial relief in Singapore.

In its Grounds of Decision, the Court recorded the seminal nature of this case, stating that

[t]his appeal is the first case concerning [Chapter 4A] in Part X of the Women’s Charter… to reach this Court.

oangledes213

Recent Posts

Beautician acquitted of allegations that she had performed injections in contravention of the Medical Registration Act

Following four days of trial in the District Court, the learned District Judge Eddy Tham…

8 months ago

High Court reduces sentence of knife-wielding man shot in Clementi

Eugene Thuraisingam LLP successfully reduced the jail sentence of Mr Soo Cheow Wee, who was…

10 months ago

Contract: High Court dismisses claim for breach of contract

Eugene Thuraisingam LLP successful in defending company and its director against claims brought by a…

1 year ago

Roszaidi bin Osman v PP – Court of Appeal Reduces Drug Courier’s Death Penalty to Life Sentence

This article outlines how the death penalty in a drug trafficking case was reduced to…

1 year ago

PP v Miya Manik – Court of Appeal upholds acquittal of man charged with murder

The High Court's acquittal of a man who was charged with Murder has been upheld…

1 year ago

Chelsea Tan Yan Qi v PP – Sentencing Principles on imposing fines for Indigent Offenders

In this case, the High Court clarified sentencing principles on imposing fines on indigent offenders.

2 years ago