Judgment on Jolovan Wham’s contempt of court case reserved

Contempt of Court case

1. Introduction

On 9 October 2018, Mr Jolovan Wham was convicted for the offence of contempt of court by scandalising the court under section 3(1)(a) of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016 (No. 19 of 2016).

Section 3(1)(a) provides

Contempt by scandalising court, interfering with administration of justice, etc.

3.—(1) Any person who —
(a) scandalises the court by intentionally publishing any matter or doing any act that —
(i) imputes improper motives to or impugns the integrity, propriety or impartiality of any court; and
(ii) poses a risk that public confidence in the administration of justice would be undermined;

2. Background

Mr Jolovan Wham published a Facebook post alleging that Malaysia’s judges were more independent than Singapore’s when it comes to political implications.

This led the Attorney-General’s Chambers (“AGC”) to initiating a contempt of court against Mr Jolovan Wham.

A politician from Singapore Democratic Party, Mr John Tan, said on Facebook that the AGC’s actions confirmed the truth of Mr Jolovan Wham’s Facebook post.

3. Legal arguments made in March 2019

In the High Court on Wednesday, 20 March 2019, we made arguments on the appropriate sentences that should be meted out to Mr Jolovan Wham and Mr John Tan, who had each published certain posts on their respective Facebook pages in 2018 that the High Court later ruled to have been in contempt of court.

For Mr Jolovan Wham, the prosecution sought a fine of between S$10,000 to S$15,000 and in default, imprisonment for two to three weeks. For Mr John Tan, the prosecution sought an imprisonment term of “at least 15 days”.

These are relatively novel cases as the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016 only took effect as of 1 October 2018.

Judgment has been reserved and will be delivered at a later date.

Niszam

Recent Posts

asialaw rankings 2024-25: ETLLP ranked again for Dispute Resolution and Labour & Employment

We are delighted to announce that Eugene Thuraisingam LLP has been recognised in the prestigious…

2 months ago

Victory in the Court of Appeal for Mohamed Mubin Bin Abdul Rahman

We are pleased to announce a significant acquittal for our client, Mr Mohamed Mubin Bin…

3 months ago

ETLLP partners and practices ranked in Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific 2024

ET LLP ranked in four practice areas, 2 partners ranked individually In the latest edition…

6 months ago

TU Law Run 2024

The Thammasat University (TU) Law Run 2024 was held in Bangkok, Thailand on Sunday, 10…

8 months ago

‘Emotionally devastating’: Lawyers on the mental toll of defending those facing the death penalty

In Singapore, the death penalty can be imposed for offences including murder, drug trafficking, use…

8 months ago

Is it an offence to not report crime?

In an article by TODAY, lawyers and experts alike shared their insights on the legal…

9 months ago