Disputes between neighbours in Singapore are not uncommon. These neighbourly disputes include:
The first neighbour dispute case where an Exclusion Order was issued by the Community Dispute Resolution Tribunal, involved a family that was allegedly harassed incessantly with hammering sounds and loud music.
According to the written answer by the Ministry of National Development (“MND”) on the number of complaints received in relation to noise from neighbours in HDB estates since the start of 2020, from January to September 2020, HDB has received about 11,400 cases of feedback relating to noise from residents’ daily activities, up from about 3,600 cases for the same time period in 2019.
From January to March 2020, there were about 500 cases of such feedback per month. This increased to about 1,800 cases of feedback per month from April to July 2020, especially during the Circuit Breaker period when most of us had to stay at home.
From August 2020, the number of such feedback dropped to 1,300 per month, likely due to the return of students to school and more workers to workplaces.
One such neighbourly nuisance case that happened during Circuit Breaker was between condominium neighbours who allegedly splashed water and caused unreasonable noise from bouncing of basketball. She was brought to court in a private prosecution. The trial to continue in July.
Recently, in a separate neighbourly dispute where the neighbour not only attempted to resolve the dispute by reaching out to the neighbour but also contacted the condominium managing body but to no avail. This dispute arises out of a neighbour’s incessant playing of the piano during the Circuit Breaker, and it continues for another six months from October 2020.
Joel Wong was approached by CNA for his comments on what the residents with nuisance neighbours do to resolve their dispute and if most of these disputes are resolved.
Joel explains:
A magistrate’s complaint seeks punishment for the offender, while a civil suit seeks compensation.
In magistrate’s complaints, the person filing it will have to bear his own legal costs, while costs in a civil suit are decided at the end based on “blameworthiness”.
Whether getting a stiff penalty in court is enough to stop a neighbour depends on their personality and demeanour.
In general, yes – an adverse court ruling is likely to deter the neighbour from causing further nuisance.
We are proud to share that Eugene Thuraisingam LLP has been ranked for the fourth…
We are delighted to announce that Eugene Thuraisingam LLP has been recognised in the prestigious…
We are pleased to announce a significant acquittal for our client, Mr Mohamed Mubin Bin…
ET LLP ranked in four practice areas, 2 partners ranked individually In the latest edition…
The Thammasat University (TU) Law Run 2024 was held in Bangkok, Thailand on Sunday, 10…
In Singapore, the death penalty can be imposed for offences including murder, drug trafficking, use…